YES!!! (P-G, Tony Norman)
Go baby, go baby, go! (P-G, Ruth Ann Daily)
This is a bold one. I don’t know much about State Rep. Bill DeWeese, except his name is usually associated with evil. I guess that’s what he’s protesting. Unless someone wants to draw me a map with a big red X over it, I’ll present this link without much further comment. (P-G OpEd, Bill DeWeese)
Illegal Search, Question Mark? It is true the judge is now questioning into how the feds searched for evidence. Guilty, innocent or something in between — I am sure Dr. Cyril Wecht would in any event be arguing that certain evidence must be thrown out. And as Mr. Wecht is doing the arguing, I am sure any judge would be compelled to examine that contention very thoroughly. (Trib, Edit Board)
And now, the electronic media…
Maria ties some events together in an enlightening and entertaining way. (2 Political Junkies)
Also she posts a truly great video. (2PJs)
D-6 candidate Robert Daniel LaVelle has a nuanced, almost must-read position on no-bid contracts and campaign contributions. He seems heavily into the green economy and environmentalism. Additionally, he would not particularly recommend the Hill District CBA as a model. (View from BurghChair)
The Allegheny Institute has actually been on fire lately. Too much to link to separately. Just read it for a while. (Allegheny Institute)
A major-league chronicle of development efforts on Mt. Washington broke out over here! It sounds like a classic tale of Lucy taking the ball out from under Charlie Brown again and again and again. The story continues tomorrow. (15211, 15211 and 15211)
Schultz presents us with an interesting chart:
Luke almost tripled-up Dan Onorato in terms of contributions with paper trails? That’s unpossible! (Thoughts on Government & other stuff)
Speaking of our County Executive, the question we must ask ourselves is: is our governments saving? (Pgh Conservative)
Very important: Patrick Dowd addresses the shuttering of Schenley. [LINK]
[Dowd] said he’ll detail his stance on campaign donations today. Council meets at 1:30 p.m. to discuss Mr. Ravenstahl’s proposal to put a $4,600 cap on contributions by individuals and partnerships to any given campaign, and a $10,000 limit on political action committee donations. (P-G, Rich Lord)
No where in the article did it state that Patrick already voted in favor of strict regulations on contributions as part of Councilman Peduto’s prior excellent campaign finance reform package.
No where in the article does it point out that $4,600 / $10,000 caps are ludicrously high by the standard of commonplace reform legislation for major metropolitan areas.
Cringer, anyone? I thought we were past appeasing authority.
The debate on the mayor’s contribution bill now shifts to council, where Councilman William Peduto plans to amend it. He wants lower contribution limits, a legislated ban on no-bid contracts of more than $25,000 and an online database of contributions and contracts.
“I will not vote for a bill that does not contain all three of them,” he said. (P-G, ibid)
We trust that greater clarity will emerge on Mr. Dowd’s position during today’s proceedings. It seems about that time, or at least it will.
Meanwhile, Carmen Robinson came off sounding very well in this piece. I hope the print edition ran a photograph of her as well.