12 thoughts on “Loading…

  1. anon

    Bram, P4 is a ruse. Zoning is (or should be) objective. All of the articles about non-profit power really do merge into the concept of P4. P4 is a subjective way for rich, powerful and connected people to use a confusing set of principles to justify whatever they want to do, whenever they want to do it. While not P4, and more zoning, see below:


    Just think about this. Lots of people spent a lot of time with consultants and community input coming up with standards for development in the new SS IPOD and then, BAM! Just like that the standards and consulting reports and community input are thrown out. Why? Because the developer and development are allies of the current administration.

    P4 will be even worse. It will be a subject way for political and powerful people to support projects from people they like and squash those from people they don’t. The entire objective of zoning and public subsidy should be to eliminate subjectivity and the political hand at play. Isn’t that what Peduto supporters fought for over a long time? Or was it all a ruse just to gain power and then use the same tactics? When will good people stand up to this type of corruption?

  2. anon

    Wondering what Bram thinks about PennPlaza deal. I’m going to skip over the part about Peduto being a total sellout, i.e., only thing the developer gave up was a $1 million for the park. Nothing else is new. But my bigger issue public process. Will this go back through planning commission? If it doesn’t, then is this really a public approval? there was a public process and that process denied this development. Does the city get to just take this out of the public’s hands and make a decision by fiat?

    1. Bram ReichbaumBram R

      I don’t know what to think of the merits of the deal, as I don’t understand them. I do think it’s notable that of the four “neighborhood groups” the city negotiated with, only the Enright Park group was actually involved in objecting to the closure of Penn Plaza and its transformation into Whole Foods… the rest are CDC’s. The rabble-rousing groups seem to have been boxed out as too ideological. EDIT: This is sort of wrong, those CDC’s were involved in litigation against LG Realty. But they’re not primarily about housing affordability and advocacy, or they’re not “pressure groups,” to borrow the political lingo.

      Sorry I haven’t been mustering posts. Cynicism is a very tough place to blog from, and this is an obscenely cynical time for politics. I also second-guess whether anybody is interested in opinions like mine anymore. Hopefully soon I’ll be in a more optimistic space.

      1. anon

        You can help with the cynicism but blogging. I say that because much of the cynicism and probably election of Trumpster is that average people don’t trust anyone. Why? Because they see every day politicians and talking heads change their opinions or remain silent depending on who is doing the doing. It is all so team based anymore that regular people see through the bs. Obama threatens to destroy North Korea; silence. Trump threatens to destroy North Korea, people go crazy. Obama uses executive orders, people go crazy. Trump uses executive orders; silence there are very few independent thinkers out there anymore.

      2. Bram ReichbaumBram Reichbaum Post author

        Does it help though? Luke isn’t history because of anyone investigating or parsing and explaining what he did or didn’t do in office. He’s history because of whatever personal dirt his bodyguards threatened to blab about. If you want to make political change, my advice is to hire private investigators and computer hackers and embarrass whoever you don’t appreciate. Or hire… someone. Over 8 years of blogging I think I was bought 5 drinks. That’s not sustainable given the sheer amount of work involved and abuse absorbed to do it well.

        All the information is out there. Regular people can see the BS just fine. They just expect nothing better and they just want their side’s BS to win — “their side” usually being whichever figurehead sort of looks or talks a bit like themselves. Hell, I supported Joe Biden because I relate to his jokes and gaffes, and Bernie Sanders in part because he reminds me of my dad and Larry David. I know how it works.

  3. anon

    Bram, seriously, we need some good blogging and press right now. the major local press is totally neutered. For example – take UPMC. How is it that only a few years ago UPMC was the enemy. the community fought expansion in virtually every neighborhood and the community was generally seen as justified. UPMC was the behemoth that used improper tactics, bought off politicians and steamrolled employees and communities. Now, not a peep and the mayor is “gushing?” What changed so quickly?

    1. Bram ReichbaumBram Reichbaum Post author

      Who is “we”? Is “we” Peduto’s political rivals who want to see him called out on his own evident hypocrisy and flip-flops, so they can get in office and do the exact same thing? Or is “we” the ideologues with infinitesimal constituencies who will drag Peduto over the coals until all the rich people and business owners are wearing concrete boots at the bottom of the Mon, making them impossible to rely on as allies or negotiating partners? Are “we” the folks who called me a sellout 4 seconds after the election for saying I’d like to be able to take a ride in an Uber, even if I don’t want Uber to take over the whole city? Or are “we” the people who work for some piss-ant nonprofit or advocacy group run by a foundation, who take every critique of their org as a personal attack on their integrity? Help me out here.

      You’re right, it’s all team-based. Right now 60% of the Democratic party is defending pay-to-play as AOK, including 100% of the people who are adept enough at life to have earned a commercial platform somewhere. I don’t know what’s supposed to be done if people are like that.

      We don’t need the robots to drive us; we need the robots to govern us. Until then, the majority of people and the political consensus wants to see the value of their investments in the city rise, and to collect their paychecks from dead robber barons. That can happen without anyone staying up all night cutting and pasting and bleeding into a well.

  4. anon

    “We” are none of the above. We are the regular people, rich, poor, but mostly in between, who just live their daily lives. We generally aren’t a part of any particular group, except the group of people who care most about our families and jobs. We just want fairness, as much as we can get it. We can clearly see what is happening, but don’t know how to stop. Our only choice will be to eventually just move out of the City, like generations before us did because of the same crap. WE don’t want to have to choose sides in every argument. We just want to be able to say we like this or don’t like that without being labelled in any particular camp. We know the camps exist, but the “We” that matters most are the people that generally aren’t in any camp. We generally can’t be found at community meetings or Grant Street. Not because we don’t care, far from it, but we have jobs (sometimes two) and kids and life and everything that comes with it. We are the people our elected officials are supposed to represent but generally don’t because we don’t engage in pressure politics. We have no one to stand up for us.

  5. anon

    When we look at Hays Park, BRT, Pens Development, etc. – does “public process” under Peduto simply mean we will hold meetings and then do exactly what we want to do anyway? Because it seems that way.

    1. Bram ReichbaumBram Reichbaum Post author

      Clearly the meetings aren’t to gather community input (held as they now are sometimes mere days before a decision is announced, and with the most crucial outcomes tightly proscribed) nor for the community to share their input openly (contained as they are in quiet silos, table by table.)

      They’re to go on record in front of the media that they have in fact held a community meeting… with the mayor’s message being the one reporters hear, residents’ messages being ones they don’t, and nothing unexpected occurring.

      1. anon

        Alas, the media is dead around here. I don’t blame Peduto, he is doing what any politician would do. I blame us and i blame the media.

  6. anon

    Your “east shore” stuff is spot on, but deserves more attention. Why is it that we so often forget that this stuff is all very simple. Follow the money. That is all you have to do – follow the money. Who is getting it and who isn’t? Affordable housing versus development. Environmentalism versus industry. Name a battleground and it is all about following the money.

    In the development and social justice arena follow the money. When mass scale affordable housing and related issues come to the forefront, who is making all the money? Is it the same people that make money off other government initiatives under a different brand? I submit as Exhibit No. 1 the Walnut Capital affordable housing project in East Liberty.

    There will be lots of money flowing into the East Shore concept. A lot of it will flow to architects and consulting companies. They will generally be the same ones you see in different arenas in Pgh. It will flow to a few developers. Again, they will be the same people you can find around town. A couple elite law firms will do the advising and legal work. Perhaps a couple PR firms will get in on the mix. And then they will all make donations to the politicians that ran the process and helped get it all done. And in the end, will the “community” or the ‘people” really have gained much? Will they really have gained much power? Or is it one more example of money and process being used to keep the “people” in line (actually the back of the line) while the same old group of wealthy people line their pockets in the name of empowerment?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload the CAPTCHA.