|Post-Gazette, unknown graphic artist|
1. Holy cow, what a story!
On one hand you have a private security company and individuals therein accused of grossly overexerting their jurisdiction and authority in a way redolent of what has become an issue at public housing developments, and belligerently to boot.
But on the other hand you have a City police chief accused of being friendly with one company’s owner to the point of reassigning a sergeant for interfering with that company’s “contract”.
This will take a little while to shake out.
Mr. Dowd said solicitor Daniel Regan told council during an executive session that a complaint about the tree had been lodged with the city in 2007 but that no pruning ever was done. Mr. Dowd said he knows of at least one other case in which complaints about a tree have gone unaddressed for two years.
In all, Mr. Dowd said, the city has received 2,500 complaints about tree problems since 2009. That includes nearly 500 so far this year, half of which remain unresolved, he said. (P-G, Joe Smydo)
To reference things discussed during closed-door “executive sessions” with the city attorney, is to get serious. One hopes Dowd’s zinger about “just doesn’t come to work” wasn’t one of them.
See also the Trib’s Bob Bauder for notes on tree density and specimen diversity.
UPDATE: The Blogh timely notes that Tree Pittsburgh is a nonprofit which conducts tree plantings and “ongoing care” of our “urban forest.” It has has a board and a staff which organizes volunteer events.
3. Adding to accusations of disinterest are those of pettiness…
At 7:13 a.m., 8:54 a.m. and 9:02 a.m. Tuesday, [Peduto staff] Gilman received emails from Mr. Kaczorowski. Mr. Kaczorowski doesn’t deny sending the emails.
In the first email, part of a string that had “paper street article” in the subject line, Mr. Kaczorowski said, without elaborating, “Another BS statement …” He then said, “On another front, sorry to inform you but after second thought Sellers may not be paved this year until the catch basin issue is resolved.” (P-G, Joe Smydo II)
The emotional content of e-mails — sarcasm vs. sincerity — is often very easy to misinterpret.
4. Post-Gazette editorialists stump for character, charm and “the produce business” in regards to Bunchervania. One hopes they are not by-implication stumping for the present derelict emptiness. Buncher holds most of the cards [i.e. deeds] along the Allegheny Riverfront and can play the long game, waiting out this whole historical epoch entirely.
Read that again because that’s very important.
5. According to this Trib account, the dispute over previous Penn State fracking research had to do with its projections of economic benefit from natural gas drilling — not from measuring environmental dangers. It is noteworthy that the Marcellus Shale Coalition is saying that we can rely on government data. We note this so you don’t come across as ignorant in your dealings.
6. Presidential politics!
The breakdown from 2 Political Junkies begins like so…
1. Romney kept his answers detail-free but full of lies.
Over at A Spork in the Drawer, we find a centuries-old primer with implied contemporary relevance on how to swindle Americans.
Chris Potter at the CP Blogh actually questions whether the POTUS’s heart was in it.
I’m really not sure who is locally blogging national politics on the conservative end of the spectrum these days. Carbolic Smoke Ball highlighted the fact that things seemed more than a little rough last night for President Obama.
The best analysis in terms of political stage-management might have come across my Twitter feed: