The loyal opposition gets a gold star today for seizing an opportunity to open a ripe discussion.
The four explained that the proposal may cede too much “Land Bank Power”* to the Mayor, or that it may not sufficiently address the inequitable distribution of “Bankable Land”* across the city (it tends to collect in hard-luck tracts and pockets). These sorts of difficulties they suggested might necessitate more of a Council role at the code or general level.
There remains a special session and a public hearing to be scheduled. Burgess motioned to hold today’s considerations, having established that we ought get hype*.
*- Editor’s terms
BONUS: Transition buy-outs and position eliminations: this looks like the ticket.